[kepler-dev] New Actor: UserIp Check in or Not?

[subhav mital]

Yes, that is correct. It pops up a new dialog each time it fires based on
the integer value specified in the firingCountLimit parameter.

On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Edward A. Lee <eal at eecs.berkeley.edu>wrote:

>
> Yes, I agree that the feel of your actor is pretty different,
> and I also agree that it would be useful to have it in the library.
>
> I presume it pops up a new dialog each time it fires?
>
> Edward
>
>
> subhav mital wrote:
>
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Actually, when I created this, I did not know that Interactive Shell can
>> do this.
>>
>> Anyways, functionality wise, both do the same. However on second thoughts,
>> UserIp, in my opinion would seem like a more elegant implementation of this
>> scenario.
>>
>> Moreover, I thought the term Interactive Shell would not intuitively seem
>> to mimic the functionality that this scenario is trying to capture, since it
>> would appear as a typical Unix Shell Command Interpretor.
>>
>>
>> Attached is the snapshot the actor. (Left is UserIp and to its right is
>> Interactive Shell)
>>
>> However, both achieve the same goal.
>>
>> Also, UserInput sounds like a much better name. Ip was just a short form I
>> wrote while creating it, not realizing that refactoring it to a better name
>> would cause problems. However, this can be corrected if needed.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kepler-dev mailing list
>> Kepler-dev at kepler-project.org
>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/pipermail/kepler-dev/attachments/20091003/3e5967b4/attachment.html>