[kepler-dev] New Actor: UserIp Check in or Not?

[Edward A. Lee]

Yes, I agree that the feel of your actor is pretty different,
and I also agree that it would be useful to have it in the library.

I presume it pops up a new dialog each time it fires?

Edward


subhav mital wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> Actually, when I created this, I did not know that Interactive Shell can 
> do this.
> 
> Anyways, functionality wise, both do the same. However on second 
> thoughts, UserIp, in my opinion would seem like a more elegant 
> implementation of this scenario.
> 
> Moreover, I thought the term Interactive Shell would not intuitively 
> seem to mimic the functionality that this scenario is trying to capture, 
> since it would appear as a typical Unix Shell Command Interpretor.
> 
> 
> Attached is the snapshot the actor. (Left is UserIp and to its right is 
> Interactive Shell)
> 
> However, both achieve the same goal.
> 
> Also, UserInput sounds like a much better name. Ip was just a short form 
> I wrote while creating it, not realizing that refactoring it to a better 
> name would cause problems. However, this can be corrected if needed.
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kepler-dev mailing list
> Kepler-dev at kepler-project.org
> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eal.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/pipermail/kepler-dev/attachments/20091003/310677ce/attachment.vcf>