[kepler-dev] Non-Compiling Code in the Kepler Tree

Matthew Brooke brooke at nceas.ucsb.edu
Tue Jan 31 20:56:57 PST 2006


 > What should we do with it?  I think we'd be best served by
 > renaming it with a non .java extension so it won't be built.

Sounds like a splendid idea to me

m


Kevin Ruland wrote:
> Matthew Brooke wrote:
>>
>> > Can you enumerate some of the problem files?
>>
>> src/org/kepler/scia/UDF_split.java (package has been commented out)
>>
>> src/org/kepler/objectmanager/cache/DataCacheViewer.java
>>
> 
> Well, this is one that I broke.  With the DataCache rewrite it became 
> very much broken.  I had thought about putting it in the Attic but since 
> there was quite a bit of love in there, it just didn't seem right.  This 
> one will be a long term break because it will be a significant piece of 
> work to resurrect it.  What should we do with it?  I think we'd be best 
> served by renaming it with a non .java extension so it won't be built.
>> src/doc/doclets/ActorClassWriter.java (fails only under JDK1.5)
>>
>> (and the JUnit tests you know about)
>>
> Now I do...  Even though I probably broke them on Friday :)
>> Something I didn't clarify in my email is that I'm really referring to 
>> "long-term" breaks - which is what the 3 non-test classes above are. 
>> We all manage to break the build occasionally, which is no big deal 
>> because it's usually fixed quickly, once pointed out (eg your JUnit 
>> probs).
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> m
>>
> 

-- 

---------------------------------------------
Matthew Brooke, Ph.D.
Marine Sciences Research Building, Room #3407
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA  93106-6150
ph: (805) 893-7108   fx: 805-893-8062
brooke at nceas.ucsb.edu
---------------------------------------------


More information about the Kepler-dev mailing list