[kepler-dev] breaking off a kepler-docs repository
sbowers at ucdavis.edu
Thu Aug 4 11:01:35 PDT 2005
I think it is a good idea to *not* include the various publications and
presentations concerning Kepler in the code repository (cvs).
I wonder, however, if having a separate cvs for documents is the way to
go. Instead, maybe we should consider using a more traditional approach
like a document management system? I'm sure there are a number of
open-source/free ones out there (e.g., zope and plone are popular ones,
the stanford publication server is an older one). Perhaps there are
also extensions of the wiki for this?
Chad Berkley wrote:
> Hi all,
> As I sit here checking out kepler (again), waiting forever for the docs
> directory to finish, it occured to me that it might be ok to have a
> different cvs repository for kepler docs. there's no reason why a
> developer should have to checkout out a myriad of .doc and .ppt files
> everytime you need a new version of kepler. It seems to me that docs
> that actually go with the kepler software should stay in the kepler
> repository, but publications, reports and the like could be stashed
> somewhere else. Anyone have any reasons why this would be a bad idea?
> Kepler-dev mailing list
> Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
More information about the Kepler-dev