[kepler-dev] Re: Roadnet Kepler demo (fwd)

[Bertram Ludaescher]

>>>>> "TF" == Tobin Fricke <tobin at splorg.org> writes:
TF> 
TF> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Bertram Ludaescher wrote:
>> Who is officially owning Tobin's workflows now? I guess Brandon
>> could/should look at these and get them on their feet again?
TF> 
TF> I am surprised that they're not "on their feet" straight out of the CVS.
TF> I suspect that any problems are (1) due to Orb permissions [now respolved,
TF> I think], or (2) the workflow didn't work in the first place [known issues
TF> with typing, etc -- specifically in the case of ObjectToRecord].
TF> 
TF> I don't think that maintaining my workflows should be too great a
TF> priority.  


well, I think they are useful both as proof of concept/demo and as
"test workflows" ..

TF> While they should all work, they all exist just to demonstrate
TF> a particular actor or novel composition of actors.  As the actors evolve,
TF> some of these workflows will become obsolete.  Once the set of actors
TF> stabilises, though, the demonstration workflows should as well.

agreed


TF> I would be a lot more interested in seeing new workflows and new actors,
TF> such as outlined in the email I sent out a few weeks ago outlining
TF> outstanding projects in kepler/roadnet integration.  Perhaps I should
TF> bounce that email to kepler-dev.

yes, please! And I agree here also

TF> I'd like to squeeze in some hacking on kepler/roadnet but so far I've been
TF> pretty well occupied with this grad school thing. Also, my laptop died, so
TF> I am computerless for the time being, which makes spontaneous hacking a
TF> little less spontaneous.

=B-( 

hope you get a new one soon!

cheers

Bertram

TF> 
TF> Tobin