[kepler-users] unnamed ontology

[Shawn Bowers]

Hi Chris,

This is something that we are working on / fixing as part of the new
tagging work.  In general, I think it is good that an ontology has
some type of name, but a name shouldn't be required.

Shawn

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:32 AM, <chrisweed at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an ontology that is unnamed, which causes Kepler to show an incorrect
> error:
> "Cannot locate ontology: /path-to/ontology.owl"
>
> I don't know if you want to support unnamed ontologies.
>
> The text of the error is also not selectable, which I think i brought up
> before
> and may already have a bug for it.
>
> <!-- My ontology -->
> <rdf:RDF ...>
> <owl:Ontology rdf:about="">
> </owl:Ontology>
>
> <owl:Class rdf:about="#MyClass">
> <rdfs:label rdf:datatype="&xsd;string"
>>MyClass</rdfs:label>
> </owl:Class>
> </rdf:RDF>
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Kepler-users mailing list
> Kepler-users at kepler-project.org
> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users
>
>