[kepler-dev] R version for kepler 2.0?

[Oliver Soong]

I use a mix of versions from 2.9.0 through 2.10.1, depending on the
computer and VM.  The only problems I've encountered have to do with
trying to run new R packages on old versions of R.

Oliver


On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:31 PM, ben leinfelder
<leinfelder at nceas.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> Well...
> For the regular RExpression actor it's probably fine to upgrade to 2.10. I'm
> guessing most R users keep up to date with the releases (Oliver using 2.10?)
> and we might as well ship the latest that we can.
> For the experimental RExpression2 actor that uses native bindings...I'd have
> to check that those are available for each of the three platforms before
> saying whether we should ship with 2.10. I know of only one person in
> Bertram's group that is using the RExpression2 actor, so it's a limited
> audience. With the module manager, we could roll out a patch that includes
> the updated RExpression2 libs as r-2.1 if need be.
> I'll investigate the JRI libraries that may or may not exist for R 2.10 and
> get back to you.
> -ben
>
> On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Chad Berkley wrote:
>
>> We are currently using and shipping R 2.9.0 with Kepler.  I'm wondering if
>> we should upgrade that to R 2.10.1 which is the newest.  Does anyone see a
>> problem with doing this?  Ben, specifically, is there a reason to update or
>> should we just leave it as is.
>>
>> thanks,
>> chad
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kepler-dev mailing list
>> Kepler-dev at kepler-project.org
>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kepler-dev mailing list
> Kepler-dev at kepler-project.org
> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>



-- 
Oliver Soong
Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management
University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131
805-893-7044 (office)
610-291-9706 (cell)