[tcs-lc] difference between IsParentOf/IsChildOf; and Includes/IsIncludedIn RelationshipTypes?

Kennedy, Jessie J.Kennedy at napier.ac.uk
Fri Sep 23 00:09:11 PDT 2005


I agree with Rich.
 
Jessie

________________________________

From: tcs-lc-bounces at ecoinformatics.org on behalf of Richard Pyle
Sent: Fri 9/23/2005 06:12
To: tcs-lc at ecoinformatics.org
Subject: Re: [tcs-lc] difference between IsParentOf/IsChildOf;and Includes/IsIncludedIn RelationshipTypes?




I think one of the standards of practice in general will be only establish
the most proximate relationships -- regardless of whether you use
parent/child or includes/included in.

For example, if I establish that my concept of genus Centropyge is included
in family concept Pomacatnhidae, and that family concept Pomacanthidae is
included in order concept Perciformes, I shouldn't also establish an
explicit relationship that Centropyge is included in Perciformes.

Similar with vernacular names -- I don't think it should be encouraged
(though it's certainly not prohibited) to establish a relationship of "Aus
bus is included in vernacular Rotifer", if we already have a hierarchical
chain connecting Aus bus, to Rotifera, and separately connecting vernacular
"rotifer" to scientific "Rotifera".

Rich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcs-lc-bounces at ecoinformatics.org
> [mailto:tcs-lc-bounces at ecoinformatics.org]On Behalf Of Nozomi Ytow
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:33 PM
> To: tcs-lc at ecoinformatics.org
> Subject: Re: [tcs-lc] difference between IsParentOf/IsChildOf; and
> Includes/IsIncludedIn RelationshipTypes?
>
>
> Hi Jessie,
>
> > The includes/included in is to capture the equivalence between two
> > concepts in different classifications or revisions, i.e. horizontal
> > relationships between classifications.
>
> I'd like to point out that there are cases relationship between a
> scientific named TaxonConcept and vernacular concept falls in
> include/inlucded, e.g. "Aus bus is a rotifer".  Vernacular name
> rotifer may mean Rotifera, but used prior to definition of Rotifera.
>
> JMS
> _______________________________________________
> Tcs-lc mailing list
> Tcs-lc at ecoinformatics.org
> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/tcs-lc


_______________________________________________
Tcs-lc mailing list
Tcs-lc at ecoinformatics.org
http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/tcs-lc



This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be read, copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University without the permission of the sender.
It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments are scanned for viruses or other defects. Napier University does not accept liability for any loss
or damage which may result from this email or any attachment, or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Email entering the 
University's system is subject to routine monitoring and filtering by the University. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/tcs-lc/attachments/20050923/da4534dc/attachment.htm


More information about the Tcs-lc mailing list