[tcs-lc] where to go now..

Roger Hyam roger at hyam.net
Fri Mar 11 06:03:35 PST 2005


I think it is important to establish that we can continue changing the 
schema after the 20th and it is not set in stone at that point.

Is this correct Jessie?

I think we have more than a weeks work to do on this and some of us are 
in a conference for that week as well!

Roger



Sally Hinchcliffe wrote:

>Hi all
>
>  
>
>>>Could you just take the part of the LC that covers CanonicalName,
>>>CanonicalAuthorship and the Label and drop it into the place where
>>>the ABCD name element was in TCS?
>>>      
>>>
>Rich wrote:
> 
>  
>
>>I think this is a sensible approach. However, there are a few basic issues
>>that remain in my mind:
>>
>>1) Somewhere, on some wiki, it seemed like most people agreed that "Kingdom"
>>could/would be replaced by "NomenclaturalCode" (or whatever makes sense to
>>call it).  True?  If so, it is probably something that does not belong as a
>>root TaxonConcept element, but rather belongs somewhere within the "Name"
>>element (indeed, somewhere specifically within "ScientificName").
>>
>>    
>>
>I agree ... 
>  
>
>>2) Similarly, I think "Rank" is also a function of a Name, rather than of a
>>concept, and probably belongs within "Name" or even "ScientificName".
>>
>>    
>>
>Also agree ...
>  
>
>>3) What is the difference between the "Label" element of LC, and the
>>"NameSimple" element of TCS?
>>    
>>
>
>Don't know 
>  
>
>>>The rest of LC is optional
>>>anyway and afaik those bits of LC are now fairly well agreed?
>>>      
>>>
>>Agreed.
>>
>>    
>>
>There are also Roger's comments from the document that kicked 
>this whole discussion off. As I remember, some of these were 
>uncontroversial - setting up a 'text' (or label?) alternative 
>consistently in each element, possibly adding verbatim elements 
>consistently, using UBIF metadata in the main schema (I've used 
>this for IPNI & I think it's pretty neat and powerful) & having a 
>clearer and consistently used naming convention for things like 
>simple / atomised / text elements.
>
>Sally
>
>*** Sally Hinchcliffe
>*** Computer section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
>*** tel: +44 (0)20 8332 5708
>*** S.Hinchcliffe at rbgkew.org.uk
>_______________________________________________
>tcs-lc mailing list
>tcs-lc at ecoinformatics.org
>http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/tcs-lc
>
>  
>

-- 

==============================================
 Roger Hyam
----------------------------------------------
 Biodiversity Informatics
 Independent Web Development 
----------------------------------------------
 http://www.hyam.net  roger at hyam.net
----------------------------------------------
 2 Janefield Rise, Lauder, TD2 6SP, UK.
 T: +44 (0)1578 722782 M: +44 (0)7890 341847
==============================================


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/tcs-lc/attachments/20050311/11d27407/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: roger.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 275 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/tcs-lc/attachments/20050311/11d27407/roger.vcf


More information about the Tcs-lc mailing list