[tcs-lc] Let's not bother with the codes any more :)

[Richard Pyle]

> You must be psychic. You answered my other email
> with this email within 2 seconds of my posting it!

I thought it was obvious by now that I type just really, really fast... :-)

If you find discrepancies between my two sets of answers (one accidental,
one explicit), let me know.

> Hey if we can have a 'de facto' name object there
> can't be any harm us having a real one.  We could
> start with a real one and just put a wrapper round
> it when we wanted it to be incognito as a concept
> then everyone would be happy!

That's sort of what LC was about -- develop the name-object schema
independently of TCS, then slip it into a TCS wrapper.  In this regard, from
my view that little ol' Nominal Concept is just sitting there in the
end-zone with its arms wide open, saying "Throw me the ball...throw me the
ball..."

Rich