[tcs-lc] Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis H.Koba & T.Tateoka

[Richard Pyle]

> I worry that if IPNI is asked a simple question (like what record is
> represented by the record id 965880-1) requiring a single answer,
> then it would only be able to respond with three records (as in your
> example above).

Oh!  I thought you *wanted* to render all three names separately.  If you
meely want to present "one record" with the important bits, you could
respond with:

<TaxonConcepts>
  <TaxonConcept id="IPNI 965880-1" type="Nominal">
    <Name type="scientific">
      <ScientificName>
        <Rank>variety</Rank>
        <NameSimple>Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis</NameSimple>
        <NameComplex>Poa acroleuca var. ryukyuensis H.Koba &
T.Tateoka</NameComplex>
        <NameDetailed>
          <NomenclaturalCode type="Botanical"/>
          <NomenclaturalStatus>Accepted</NomenclaturalStatus>
          <CanonicalName>
            <Genus>Poa</Genus>
            <SpecificEpithet>acroleuca</SpecificEpithet>
            <InfraspecificEpithet>ryukyuensis</InfraspecificEpithet>
          </CanonicalName>
          <CanonicalAuthorship>
            <ProtonymAuthorship>
              <AuthorSimpleYear>H.Koba & T.Tateoka<AuthorSimpleYear>
              <Authors>
                <Name>H.Koba</Name>
                <Name>T.Tateoka</Name>
              <Authors>
            </ProtonymAuthorship>
          </CanonicalAuthorship>
          <FirstPublication>
		<PublicationSimple>H.Koba & T.Tateoka [etc...]</PublicationSimple>
          <FirstPublication>
        </NameDetailed>
      </ScientificName>
    </Name>
    <Relationships type="original species combination">
  	  <ToTaxonConcept ref="cn2"/>
    </Relationships>
  </TaxonConcept>
</TaxonConcepts>

By the way, did everyone receive the email I sent with the four xsd files
attached, with the subject-line, "Nominal Concepts as bearers of
Nomenclatural information"?

Rich