[seek-kr] eml unit dictionary

[Bertram Ludaescher]

Ha -- very good! 

I don't know. 

Shawn: didn't you find also some "bugs" (syntactic or otherwise) in
the unit dictionary? 

If so, let's report them here (or in bugzilla), so the EML masters can 
address them

Bertram

>>>>> "RW" == Rich Williams <rwilliams at nceas.ucsb.edu> writes:
RW> 
RW> A couple of questions about units in eml -
RW> 1)  why is coulomb a fundamental type when the related base type in the NIST
RW> documentation is Ampere?
RW> 
RW> 2)  why is radian a fundamental type, when it is a dimensionless quantity
RW> and is a derived type in the NIST doc?
RW> 
RW> Rich
RW> 
RW> 
RW> _______________________________________________
RW> seek-kr mailing list
RW> seek-kr at ecoinformatics.org
RW> http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/seek-kr