[seek-dev] ecogrid query
James W Brunt
jbrunt at lternet.edu
Thu Jul 22 10:43:29 PDT 2004
This is the approach we are taking here at LNO for our local data
holdings - mostly remote sensing imagery - a combined metacat for
metadata/SRB for data objects solution. Hope to have it in place this fall.
James
David Stockwell wrote:
>>
>>
>> Another option is to load EML metadata describing
>> the data into the KNB metacat, and then point that at the data objects
>> in the SRB.
>
>
> This sounds like a good option. The metadata is a used in the Global
> Ecosystems CDs and
> would be best to accommodate it. An example is listed below. Who do I
> call now?
>
> file title : Olson World Ecosystems Version 1.3A
> data type : byte
> file type : binary
> columns : 720
> rows : 360
> ref. system : lat/long
> ref. units : deg
> unit dist. : 1.0000000
> min. X : -180.0000000
> max. X : 180.0000000
> min. Y : -90.0000000
> max. Y : 90.0000000
> pos'n error : unknown
> resolution : 0.5000000
> min. value : 0
> max. value : 29
> value units : classes
> value error : unknown
> flag value : none
> flag def'n : none
> legend cats : 30
> category 0 : 0 OCEAN/SEA Oceans, Seas (including Black Sea)
> category 1 : 1 CONIFOR Conifer Forest
> category 2 : 2 BRODLFOR Broadleaf Forest: temperate, subtropical drought
> category 3 : 3 MIXEDFOR Mixed Forest: conifer/broadleaf; so. Boreal
> category 4 : 4 GRASSHRB Grassland +/- Shrub or Tree
> category 5 : 5 TROPICFR Tropical/subtr. Forest: montane, seasonal,
> rainforest
> category 6 : 6 SCRUBWDS Scrub +/- Woodland &/or fields (evergreen/decid.)
> category 7 : 7 SEMIDTUN Semidesert shrub/steppe; Tundra (polar, alpine)
> category 8 : 8 FLDWDSAV Field/Woods complex &/or Savanna, tallgrass
> category 9 : 9 NORTAIGA Northern Boreal Taiga woodland/tundra
> category 10 : 10 FORFDREV Forest/Field; Dry Evergreen broadleaf woods
> category 11 : 11 WETLAND Wetlands: mires (bog/fen); marsh/swamp +/-
> mangrove
> category 12 : 12 DESERTS Desert: bare/alpine; sandy; salt/soda
> category 13 : 13 SHRBTRST Shrub/Tree: succulent/thorn
> category 14 : 14 CROPSETL Crop/Settlement (irrigated or not)
> category 15 : 15 CONIFRFC Conifer snowy Rainforest, coastal category
> 16 : 16 not used
> category 17 : 17 not used
> category 18 : 18 not used
> category 19 : 19 MANGROVE Mangrove/wet forest/thicket + tidal flat
> category 20 : 20 WALANCST Water (~51-90%) & Land, Coast/hinterland
> complexes
> category 21 : 21 not used
> category 22 : 22 not used
> category 23 : 23 ISLFRING Island or Fringe land (91-99% water)
> category 24 : 24 LANDWATR Land/Water (~21-50%) complexes category
> 25 : 25 ICE Ice: Glaciers & emerging rocks near fringe
> category 26 : 26 POLARDES Polar Desert
> category 27 : 27 WTNDMHTH Wooded Tundra Margin; Heath/moorland
> category 28 : 28 not used
> category 29 : 29 INLDWATR Inland Water bodies (including Caspian Sea)
> comment : 14 Major Ecosystem classes and 8 fringe classes, plus Ocean
> lineage : Derived from WE1.4D by aggregating classes to .5-degree
> completeness: .5-degree coverage complete for land areas, based on WE1.4D
> consistency : All values represent spatial dominance at .5-degree
>
>
>
>
> Arcot Rajasekar wrote:
>
>> Matt
>> I like the approach of a separate metadata respository wityh links
>> to an object repository. But if the metadata is not in EML then we may
>> have to do some other metadata repository possibly MCAT.
>>
>> thanks
>> raja
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Matt Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> You can query using the existing ecogrid interfaces, but only against
>>> the metadata that is available for the data source. By default, SRB
>>> doesn't have much contextual metadata. I've talked with Raja about
>>> modifying SRB to accept an EML description of the data and load that
>>> into the extended metadata for the dataset, but that hasn't been done
>>> yet as far as I know. Another option is to load EML metadata describing
>>> the data into the KNB metacat, and then point that at the data objects
>>> in the SRB. Then, searching the EcoGrid will find metadata records in
>>> one system that point at data objects in abother system. But you'd be
>>> able to search the much more comprehensive EML metadata.
>>>
>>> If you have metadata you want to query, you can use the QueryBuilder to
>>> construct a query, but it is intended as a developer's tool for testing,
>>> not an end-user tool. Steve Tekell is designing and implementing a
>>> web-based query app for EcoGrid targeted at scientists. When finished,
>>> it will be installed as part of the SEEK web site. Until then, Rod's
>>> tool and the commandline client are your options for submitting a query.
>>> There is an extremely simple query tool prototype in Kepler, but right
>>> now it only searches the KNB Ecogrid node.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> David Stockwell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> We are at the point now where we would like to query
>>>> the metadata on our datasets to return a list of those of interest,
>>>> for further processing. Could anyone suggest how we might
>>>> use the ecogrid to say, query for all datasets that concern climate?
>>>> Is this something I can use the QueryBuilder for Rod?
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seek-dev mailing list
>>>> seek-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>> http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/seek-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
--
James W. Brunt
Associate Director for Information Management
Long Term Ecological Research Network Office
Department of Biology
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131-1091
505 272 7085
jbrunt at lternet.edu
More information about the Seek-dev
mailing list