[kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation

[Zhijie Guan]

Sorry but I have another group meeting from 11am to 1pm on Monday. Anyway, 
please go ahead and I will catch up with you by reading the meeting notes. 
I would also be glad to follow any documentation framework setup on the 
conference call, as far as it includes enough information for workflow 
testing. B->

Thanks!

Zhijie


On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 altintas at sdsc.edu wrote:

>
> How about having it on Monday between 11am and 12pm (or anytime...)? I'm
> out of town until Monday.
>
> Thanks!
> -ilkay
>
>> 11 - 12 (pacific time) on Thursday is fine to me.
>>
>> Jing
>>
>> Jing Tao
>> National Center for Ecological
>> Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
>> 735 State St. Suite 204
>> Santa Barbara, CA 93101
>>
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Zhijie Guan wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:05:46 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: Zhijie Guan <guan at sdsc.edu>
>>> To: Nandita Mangal <nmangal at sdsc.edu>
>>> Cc: Kepler-Dev <kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation
>>>     Conference Call
>>>
>>> Hi, All,
>>>
>>> First, Thursday 11-12 noon is good for me.
>>>
>>> The content and format of workflow documentation I proposed are only for
>>> the purpose of testing workflows. I expect to hear more
>>> suggestions/comments on the content and format the workflow
>>> documentation
>>> framework should be based on.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Zhijie
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Nandita Mangal wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Firstly would Thursday, 11am-12:00 noon be a good time for everyone to
>>>> attend the Documentation Conference Call?
>>>> In the conference call, I plan to discuss the current documentation
>>>> framework for actors which follows the Ptolemy's Documentation
>>>> Structure,
>>>> as well as get input on  how to do workflow documentation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On the topic of workflow documentation, there are certain basic issues
>>>> that need to be decided upon:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Where should we store documentation for a workflow ?
>>>>     --> In the workflow's moml file itself ?
>>>>     --> On the canvas of the workflow ?
>>>>    -->  Others?
>>>>
>>>> 2) What content / format of documentation do we require for a workflow?
>>>>     ---> Worfklow Description
>>>>     --> Workflow Author
>>>>    -->  Version
>>>>    -->  External Software Packages/External Requirements for
>>>> functioning of workflow?
>>>>    ---> Others?
>>>>    Zhijie has a full description of the proposed format in kepler-dev
>>>> posts:
>>>>
>>>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/kepler-dev/2006-February/003337.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> nandita.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>> Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kepler-dev mailing list
>>> Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kepler-dev mailing list
>> Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>
>
>