[kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation

[Chad Berkley]

works for me.

Dan Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
>     Monday would be fine with me (and it would also give me more time to 
> review the already existing documentation info).
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> altintas at sdsc.edu wrote:
> 
> 
>>How about having it on Monday between 11am and 12pm (or anytime...)? I'm
>>out of town until Monday.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>-ilkay
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>>11 - 12 (pacific time) on Thursday is fine to me.
>>>
>>>Jing
>>>
>>>Jing Tao
>>>National Center for Ecological
>>>Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
>>>735 State St. Suite 204
>>>Santa Barbara, CA 93101
>>>
>>>On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Zhijie Guan wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>>Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:05:46 -0800 (PST)
>>>>From: Zhijie Guan <guan at sdsc.edu>
>>>>To: Nandita Mangal <nmangal at sdsc.edu>
>>>>Cc: Kepler-Dev <kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org>
>>>>Subject: Re: [kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation
>>>>   Conference Call
>>>>
>>>>Hi, All,
>>>>
>>>>First, Thursday 11-12 noon is good for me.
>>>>
>>>>The content and format of workflow documentation I proposed are only for
>>>>the purpose of testing workflows. I expect to hear more
>>>>suggestions/comments on the content and format the workflow
>>>>documentation
>>>>framework should be based on.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>Zhijie
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Nandita Mangal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>Firstly would Thursday, 11am-12:00 noon be a good time for everyone to
>>>>>attend the Documentation Conference Call?
>>>>>In the conference call, I plan to discuss the current documentation
>>>>>framework for actors which follows the Ptolemy's Documentation
>>>>>Structure,
>>>>>as well as get input on  how to do workflow documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On the topic of workflow documentation, there are certain basic issues
>>>>>that need to be decided upon:
>>>>>
>>>>>1) Where should we store documentation for a workflow ?
>>>>>   --> In the workflow's moml file itself ?
>>>>>   --> On the canvas of the workflow ?
>>>>>  -->  Others?
>>>>>
>>>>>2) What content / format of documentation do we require for a workflow?
>>>>>   ---> Worfklow Description
>>>>>   --> Workflow Author
>>>>>  -->  Version
>>>>>  -->  External Software Packages/External Requirements for
>>>>>functioning of workflow?
>>>>>  ---> Others?
>>>>>  Zhijie has a full description of the proposed format in kepler-dev
>>>>>posts:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/kepler-dev/2006-February/003337.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>thanks,
>>>>>nandita.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>
>> 
>>
> 
> 
>