[kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation

Dan Higgins higgins at nceas.ucsb.edu
Wed Mar 8 09:42:31 PST 2006


Hi All,
    Monday would be fine with me (and it would also give me more time to 
review the already existing documentation info).

Dan


altintas at sdsc.edu wrote:

>How about having it on Monday between 11am and 12pm (or anytime...)? I'm
>out of town until Monday.
>
>Thanks!
>-ilkay
>
>  
>
>>11 - 12 (pacific time) on Thursday is fine to me.
>>
>>Jing
>>
>>Jing Tao
>>National Center for Ecological
>>Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
>>735 State St. Suite 204
>>Santa Barbara, CA 93101
>>
>>On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Zhijie Guan wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:05:46 -0800 (PST)
>>>From: Zhijie Guan <guan at sdsc.edu>
>>>To: Nandita Mangal <nmangal at sdsc.edu>
>>>Cc: Kepler-Dev <kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org>
>>>Subject: Re: [kepler-dev] Kepler Workflow Documentation & Documentation
>>>    Conference Call
>>>
>>>Hi, All,
>>>
>>>First, Thursday 11-12 noon is good for me.
>>>
>>>The content and format of workflow documentation I proposed are only for
>>>the purpose of testing workflows. I expect to hear more
>>>suggestions/comments on the content and format the workflow
>>>documentation
>>>framework should be based on.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Zhijie
>>>
>>>On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Nandita Mangal wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>hi all,
>>>>
>>>>Firstly would Thursday, 11am-12:00 noon be a good time for everyone to
>>>>attend the Documentation Conference Call?
>>>>In the conference call, I plan to discuss the current documentation
>>>>framework for actors which follows the Ptolemy's Documentation
>>>>Structure,
>>>>as well as get input on  how to do workflow documentation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On the topic of workflow documentation, there are certain basic issues
>>>>that need to be decided upon:
>>>>
>>>>1) Where should we store documentation for a workflow ?
>>>>    --> In the workflow's moml file itself ?
>>>>    --> On the canvas of the workflow ?
>>>>   -->  Others?
>>>>
>>>>2) What content / format of documentation do we require for a workflow?
>>>>    ---> Worfklow Description
>>>>    --> Workflow Author
>>>>   -->  Version
>>>>   -->  External Software Packages/External Requirements for
>>>>functioning of workflow?
>>>>   ---> Others?
>>>>   Zhijie has a full description of the proposed format in kepler-dev
>>>>posts:
>>>>
>>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/kepler-dev/2006-February/003337.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>thanks,
>>>>nandita.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Kepler-dev mailing list
>>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kepler-dev mailing list
>Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev
>
>  
>


-- 
*******************************************************************
Dan Higgins                                  higgins at nceas.ucsb.edu
http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/    Ph: 805-893-5127
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) Marine Science Building - Room 3405
Santa Barbara, CA 93195
*******************************************************************




More information about the Kepler-dev mailing list