where are we?

[Peter McCartney]

no problem. still writing the class to build the spatial dictonary - got
sidetracked, but its not being all that complicated. It walks through ESRI's
coordinate systems directory and creates an entry for each .prj file in all
the sub directories.

Peter McCartney (peter.mccartney at asu.edu)
Center for Environmental Studies
Arizona State University
480-965-6791 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: chad berkley [mailto:berkley at nceas.ucsb.edu]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:11 PM
> To: David Blankman
> Cc: Eml-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: where are we?
> 
> 
> That's fine with me.  Anyone have a problem with Tuesday morning at 9?
> 
> chad
> 
> On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 16:15, David Blankman wrote:
> > I  propose Tuesday morning 9 am PDT for the IRC conference.
> > 
> > . eml-project: descriptorType (is not used in current 
> model) (bug 595) FIXED
> > 
> > David Blankman wrote:
> > 
> > > I am a conflict on Monday morning. Tuesday morning would 
> be fine. I 
> > > could manage Monday afternoon if necessary.
> > >
> > > The issues that I know are still outstanding are (there 
> may be others):
> > >
> > > 1.   eml-physical/dataFormat.  The documentation review of 
> > > eml-physical has been completed except for the issues in 
> question (Bug 
> > > 602)
> > > 2.  The eml-storedProcedure/parameter complex type needs 
> to be fixed 
> > > (bug 600)
> > > 3. eml-entity/other-entity (question about making 
> atttibute required) 
> > > (bug  596)
> > > 4. eml-project: descriptorType (is not used in current 
> model) (bug 
> > > 595)FIXED
> > > 5. GIS modules (Peter McCartney is in process of revising)
> > > Chad Berkley wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I was wondering if everyone would like to get together 
> either on a phone
> > >> call or an IRC chat on Monday at 9:00 PDT to see where 
> we are with EML
> > >> and more specifically, what more needs to be done.  I 
> think we are
> > >> getting very close.  I've been looking over the 
> documentation and most
> > >> of it looks great.  Thanks everyone for getting good 
> documentation
> > >> written. 
> > >> Unless someone volunteers to pay for a phone call, I 
> would propose that
> > >> we have an IRC discussion on Monday.  I think it should 
> be short....an
> > >> hour or less.  Basically everyone should go around the 
> table and say
> > >> what they've done, what they still need to do and raise 
> any problems
> > >> that they've seen with rc1.
> > >>
> > >> If anyone has a problem with this day or time, please 
> respond to the
> > >> list with an alternate.  I'm probably going to be gone 
> next Thursday and
> > >> Friday and I would really like to get rc2 release before 
> I go, which I
> > >> think is a reasonable goal given our current status.
> > >>
> > >> Talk to you later,
> > >> chad
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> > -- 
> > David E. Blankman
> > Database Integration Developer
> > Long Term Ecological Research Network Office
> > University of New Mexico
> > 801 University, SE #104
> > Albuquerque, NM 87106
> > (505) 272-7346 / (505) 272-7080 FAX
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > eml-dev mailing list
> > eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
> > http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eml-dev mailing list
> eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
> http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/eml-dev/attachments/20020927/dd2d068f/attachment.htm