[VOTE] should we release eml-2.0.0 now?

[Dan Higgins]

approve

Matt Jones wrote:

> CALL FOR VOTES:
> ---------------
> I, as an EML Project member, agree that we should release the current 
> set of files from CVS that are tagged RELEASE_EML_2_0_0 as the final 
> EML 2.0.0 version.  This includes agreement that we will make every 
> possible effort to maintain backwards compatibility with this release 
> from this point forward (i.e., any document that is valid for EML 
> 2.0.0 would also be valid for any new versions of EML that might be 
> created in the future).
>
> Vote one of:
> ------------
>    Approve: I understand and agree with the release proposal
>    Neutral: I am neutral
> Disapprove: I block this from occurring (explanation required)
>
> Deadline:
> ---------
> Wed., December 11, 2003
>
> Project member      Vote
> ---------------     ---------
> Tim Bergsma
> Chad Berkley
> David Blankman
> Matthew Brooke
> James Brunt
> Scott Chapal
> Corinna Gries
> Daniel Higgins
> Matthew Jones       approve
> Chris Jones
> Peter McCartney
> Ken Ramsey
> Mark Schildhauer
>
>
> I will collate the results after Wednesday.  We need a quorum (9 
> voters) and of those who cast a vote, at least 2/3 approval and no 
> disapprove votes.  Looking forward to hearing your opinions...
>
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> eml-dev mailing list
> eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
> http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev



-- 
*******************************************************************
Dan Higgins                                  higgins at nceas.ucsb.edu
http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/    Ph: 805-892-2531
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) 
735 State Street - Room 205
Santa Barbara, CA 93195
*******************************************************************