[kepler-users] Exceeding heap size

[Bertram Ludaescher]

Harini:

A quick check would be to open the activity monitor or any other such OS
tool and see which processes eat up your cpu time (and memory). I've used
the Kepler trunk and RC5 recently and didn't notice degraded performance.

Bertram

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Harini Iyer <hriyer at ncsu.edu> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I am using mac osx, it has got 4G ram and I did increase the heap size.
> Even the scroll takes irritatingly long time. Kepler 1.0 was fine. I
> somehow, accidentally lost the previous version and I am trying to restore
> it.
>
> Harini
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:10 AM, David Welker <david.v.welker at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Harini,
>>
>> It is really hard to say. Like I mentioned, we haven't gotten many
>> complaints along this line.
>>
>> Are you sure it is not your system? Why not try running your old version
>> of Kepler and seeing how it performs? If it runs fast while Kepler 2.0 run
>> slow in the same environment, then at least we can attribute it to a change
>> in Kepler...
>>
>> Then there is the question of why this is occurring with you and not other
>> people? What are your hardware specs? I suppose it is possible that Kepler
>> 2.0 might be pushing the limits of your hardware capacity while Kepler 1.0
>> did not. One thing to keep in mind is that in Kepler 1.0, Ptolemy is a jar,
>> so maybe that is somehow more efficient...
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2010, at 1:04 AM, Harini Iyer wrote:
>>
>> Although this doesnt give me the OutOfMemory error, my kepler is terribly
>> slow. It was a lot faster before I installed Kepler 2.0 from the development
>> trunk. I am unable to understand it. What could be the possible reason?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:42 PM, David Welker <david.v.welker at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, that doesn't work from RC6. As far as changing the default, I
>>> haven't noticed very many other complaints.
>>>
>>> Chad, do you know how someone using an installed version of Kepler would
>>> increase the Java heap size?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 18, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Matt Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David --
>>>
>>> That only works from the build environment, right?  If he is running from
>>> the installed RC6 release candidate, what is the procedure?  And maybe the
>>> defaults should be higher if we're running into troubles?
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:36 PM, David Welker <david.v.welker at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can use:
>>>>
>>>> ant run -DjvmMaxMemory="${max}"
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 18, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Harini Iyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just upgraded to Kepler 2.0, and kepler is not extremely slow. I
>>>>> think I got a Heap OutOfMemory exception once. I think I need to allocate
>>>>> some more Heap space, I just could not figure out how. Can someone help?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Harini
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kepler-users mailing list
>>>>> Kepler-users at kepler-project.org
>>>>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kepler-users mailing list
>>>> Kepler-users at kepler-project.org
>>>> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kepler-users mailing list
> Kepler-users at kepler-project.org
> http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/mailman/listinfo/kepler-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nceas.ucsb.edu/kepler/pipermail/kepler-users/attachments/20100618/44c47119/attachment.html>