[kepler-users] More questions on configuration
tog
guillaume.alleon at gmail.com
Thu Nov 6 03:09:01 PST 2008
Hi Matt
Thanks for the quick answer.
So what is the correct process to add a new actor and its multiple
jars dependency (assuming there is no collision - or that I have
successfully streamlined the version)
Guillaume
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Matt Jones <jones at nceas.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Technically its possible to run a substantially streamlined version of
> Kepler that omits all or most of the actors and their supporting jar files.
> However, there are many relatively hidden dependencies that may be hard to
> resolve, and we do not currently have a mechanism for supporting a trimmed
> down version like this -- but we will as the modularization work I described
> earlier matures. That said, you can probably exclude most of the jar files
> in lib/jar as long as you include the lib/jar/base-jars set (which are
> required by the core) and omit all of the java code for actors from your
> build. You'll have to configure this manually at this point, which means
> tracking down all of the actor code which is spread across many java
> packages, but I know it has been done in the past. I would expect the
> process to be time consuming until we finish the modularization process and
> clarify all of the dependencies in the code. Hope this helps you out,
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:23 PM, tog <guillaume.alleon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matt
>>
>> Thanks for your quick answer.
>> I will try this new build system in a day or two.
>>
>> Could in the meantime someone comment on how to be able to have a
>> custom Kepler with only my actor i.e. removing existing actors and how
>> to add a new actor and its third-party jars.
>>
>> Thanks and Best Regards
>>
>> Guillaume
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Matt Jones <jones at nceas.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:43 AM, tog <guillaume.alleon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for asking again some more questions :)
>> >>
>> >> I have an actor that is using plenty of third-party jars (a lot of
>> >> them may collide some existing ones). For example my actor is using
>> >> jaxb with a different version than the one located in
>> >> /Applications/Kepler-1.0.0/Kepler.app/Kepler/lib/jar/
>> >>
>> >> I am therefore wondering if there is a way to isolate the loading of
>> >> dependencies on a per actor basis ?
>> >
>> > We're working on such a mechanism now. We've recognized this
>> > conflicting
>> > jar problem for a while, and now we are working on a new, modular system
>> > in
>> > which actors or packages of actors are created in independent modules
>> > and
>> > can specify their own jar dependencies, even if they have conflicting
>> > version requirements for a particular jar file. This is being
>> > accomplished
>> > through the use of independent ClassLoaders for each of the modules.
>> > Unfortunately, we are not done with this work yet and so it is not yet
>> > in
>> > the default build for kepler.
>> >
>> > However, if you want to experiment with our new build system, you could
>> > try
>> > the alternate build which handles these module dependency conflicts. It
>> > is
>> > a work in progress and is likely to still change substantially -- we're
>> > actively working on it -- so be prepared for problems if you try this
>> > system. Nevertheless, you might find it useful. To see the alternate
>> > build
>> > instructions, visit this page:
>> >
>> > https://dev.kepler-project.org/developers/teams/build/documentation/the-new-build-system
>> > Feedback on how that system works for you would be appreciated.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I have then noticed this file .classpath.default. My understanding is
>> >> that this file is containing all the (existing) jars required for the
>> >> existing actors.
>> >> Does that mean that removing all these files + the actors definition
>> >> located in /Applications/Kepler-1.0.0/Kepler.app/Kepler/kar/actors/
>> >> will lead to a kind of "empty" Kepler ?
>> >>
>> >> Therefore adding an actor is just:
>> >> - creating a kar file putting in
>> >> /Applications/Kepler-1.0.0/Kepler.app/Kepler/kar/actors/
>> >> - adding the adequate dependencies in
>> >> /Applications/Kepler-1.0.0/Kepler.app/Kepler/lib/jar
>> >> - modifying accordingly the .classpath.default file
>> >>
>> >> Am I right ?
>> >
>> > No, the .classpath.default file is only used for the eclipse build.
>> > Modifying it will not really affect how the ant build works.
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> There is then still this issue of being able to use different jars of
>> >> the same tools for different actors ?
>> >
>> > Right -- having the build and runtime system support actors that require
>> > conflicting jar files is a major requirement of the new build and
>> > runtime
>> > system. We'll get it worked out as soon as possible.
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > --
>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > Matthew B. Jones
>> > Director of Informatics Research and Development
>> > National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
>> > UC Santa Barbara
>> > jones at nceas.ucsb.edu Ph: 1-907-523-1960
>> > http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinfo
>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PGP KeyID:C1A0A73F FingerPrint:A4A2 73C0 E7D4 6437 8185 D05E ECF2
>> AD84 C1A0 A73F
>> http://cheztog.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Matthew B. Jones
> Director of Informatics Research and Development
> National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
> UC Santa Barbara
> jones at nceas.ucsb.edu Ph: 1-907-523-1960
> http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinfo
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
--
PGP KeyID:C1A0A73F FingerPrint:A4A2 73C0 E7D4 6437 8185 D05E ECF2
AD84 C1A0 A73F
http://cheztog.blogspot.com
More information about the Kepler-users
mailing list