[kepler-dev] modeling question about producing f(A, x), f(A, y)...

[Norbert Podhorszki]

Hi Tim,

None of the above. The metric is that someone like Bruce, trying to build 
his first workflow, how easily/heavily figures it out, what to use and how 
to use.

COMAD is "heavy" for the actor/workflow developers who intend to give such 
solutions, so it becomes "light" for Bruce. I would welcome that.
I meant heavy here, that probably it would be a lot of work to 
write/rewrite actors to work in COMAD mode. However, I may be terribly 
mistaken with this statement.

Norbert

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Timothy McPhillips wrote:

> Hi Norbert,
>
> Just out of curiosity, by what metric do you consider a collection-oriented 
> (or any other) solution "heavy"?  Number of actors?  Number of actor 
> interconnections?  Number of tokens passed?  Fraction of CPU time spent 
> managing data? Time spent composing the workflow?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>