[kepler-dev] Non-Compiling Code in the Kepler Tree
Matthew Brooke
brooke at nceas.ucsb.edu
Tue Jan 31 20:56:57 PST 2006
> What should we do with it? I think we'd be best served by
> renaming it with a non .java extension so it won't be built.
Sounds like a splendid idea to me
m
Kevin Ruland wrote:
> Matthew Brooke wrote:
>>
>> > Can you enumerate some of the problem files?
>>
>> src/org/kepler/scia/UDF_split.java (package has been commented out)
>>
>> src/org/kepler/objectmanager/cache/DataCacheViewer.java
>>
>
> Well, this is one that I broke. With the DataCache rewrite it became
> very much broken. I had thought about putting it in the Attic but since
> there was quite a bit of love in there, it just didn't seem right. This
> one will be a long term break because it will be a significant piece of
> work to resurrect it. What should we do with it? I think we'd be best
> served by renaming it with a non .java extension so it won't be built.
>> src/doc/doclets/ActorClassWriter.java (fails only under JDK1.5)
>>
>> (and the JUnit tests you know about)
>>
> Now I do... Even though I probably broke them on Friday :)
>> Something I didn't clarify in my email is that I'm really referring to
>> "long-term" breaks - which is what the 3 non-test classes above are.
>> We all manage to break the build occasionally, which is no big deal
>> because it's usually fixed quickly, once pointed out (eg your JUnit
>> probs).
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> m
>>
>
--
---------------------------------------------
Matthew Brooke, Ph.D.
Marine Sciences Research Building, Room #3407
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150
ph: (805) 893-7108 fx: 805-893-8062
brooke at nceas.ucsb.edu
---------------------------------------------
More information about the Kepler-dev
mailing list