[tcs-lc] Incertae Sedis, and broader issues
Nozomi Ytow
nozomi at biol.tsukuba.ac.jp
Mon Sep 19 14:15:58 PDT 2005
Hi Rich,
> Why not the standard "includes/is included in"? Same thing as "has member/is
> member of"?
Simply because it may be major modification if we reorganise
enumerated relationship types, while changing name of relationship
type is rather minor mondification.
I prefer reorganisation with subtyping, but it is too late after
recomendation vote, I think.
Cheers,
JMS
More information about the Tcs-lc
mailing list