[seek-kr-sms] observastions and spatial observation

[Joshua Madin]

Hello,

Sergey, thanks for the update.  The spatial extension looks great --  
we'll need to explore how it fits with the observation ontology, and  
how data will be annotated with concepts from this extension.  As far  
as a name for the observation ontology, there still isn't one.

There will be a KR conference call this Wednesday at 10am.  I'll send  
out a reminder tomorrow for those who are interested.  Please let me  
know if you would like to join us.

Cheers,
Josh



On Oct 30, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Bertram Ludaescher wrote:

>
> Hi Sergey:
>
> Good question -- actually I was also interested and there was a plan
> for semi-regular SEEK-KR calls. But I think there's probably been 1-1
> talks between Shawn and Josh!? Mark?
>
> Updates anybody?
>
> Bertram
>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:49:06 -0500
>>>> "Sergey Krivov" <Serguei.Krivov at uvm.edu> wrote:
> SK>
> SK> Hi Josh et al,
> SK> I am writing to ask about the latest status of the observation  
> ontology. How
> SK> things are going with SODAS (or ELMO) ? Was there any new name  
> finally
> SK> selected and where is the latest version kept?
> SK>
> SK>
> SK>
> SK> I have been working on   ontology for spatial observations and  
> have made a
> SK> first shot. At the moment it is direct formalization of OGC  
> Abstract
> SK> Specifications for Coverage types (topic 6). I use there class  
> Observation
> SK> which will link to Observation in SODAS/Observation ontology  
> and class SRC
> SK> (spatial references by coordinates, topic 2) which will link to  
> existing
> SK> ontology for SRC. Here (below)  is how it looks like and the  
> owl file is in
> SK> attachments.
> SK>
> SK>
> SK>
> SK> Any suggestions are welcome. Please let me know what you think.
> SK>
> SK>
> SK>
> SK> Sergey
> SK>
> SK>
>
>