pnorbert at ornl.gov
Thu Mar 6 10:40:17 PST 2008
Indeed, I have been doing that.
By the way, I wonder what way was this attribute (6 lines of nested
<property> elements) vomited into the xml file, because it was not indented
and even did not have a newline before the next element. Of course I messed
up the xml at the first try of removal.
I am not sure if we should suppose that people never touch the xml file but
only through Vergil. I am quite accommodated to change
parameters/values/classnames with a text editor, although I change the
workflow structure only with Vergil.
On 3/6/08 1:23 PM, "Chad Berkley" <berkley at nceas.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> Hey Norbert,
> You should remove that attribute from your workflows. I was trying to
> purge everything of that attribute since we no longer use it.
> Norbert Podhorszki wrote:
More information about the Kepler-dev