[kepler-dev] webpage suggestion

[Laura L. Downey]

I don't see inactive as being negative, just merely a state.  And because we
have an "active" state, it makes sense to have an "inactive" state.

Although I don't understand Inactive (past) members; I interpret inactive as
current members, but not active.  So inactive but past, makes no sense to
me.

I interpret past or previous members, as not currently members.

All that said, if we really mean people that are no longer members, then
"previous members" seems reasonable.

Laura L. Downey
Senior Usability Engineer
LTER Network Office
Department of Biology, MSC03 2020
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM  87131-0001
505.277.3157 office
505.610.9657 mobile
505.277-2541 fax
ldowney at lternet.edu
 

-----Original Message-----
From: kepler-dev-bounces at ecoinformatics.org
[mailto:kepler-dev-bounces at ecoinformatics.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Bowers
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:59 PM
To: Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
Subject: [kepler-dev] webpage suggestion


Hi all,

I noticed recently that on the kepler webpage there is now
a section called "Inactive (past) members".

I think a better way to phrase this, which is not so negative,
would be "Previous members".  Anyone mind if I change this
wording?

-shawn
_______________________________________________
Kepler-dev mailing list
Kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev