[Fwd: [kepler-dev] [VOTE] request membership for Werner G. Krebs]

[altintas@sdsc.edu]

Dear All,

The deadline for the vote request below was written 8th by mistake.
The real deadline for the vote is september 10th.

So far, I've gotten approve votes from Edward, Bertram and Chad.

Please send you votes at your earliest convenience.

Best wishes,
Ilkay

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: [kepler-dev] [VOTE] request membership for Werner G. Krebs From: 
  "Ilkay Altintas" <altintas at sdsc.edu>
Date:    Fri, September 3, 2004 2:44 pm
To:      "Kepler-Dev" <kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org>
Cc:      "Werner G. Krebs" <wkrebs at sdsc.edu>
         "Mark Miller" <mmiller at sdsc.edu>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear All,

I would like to nominate Werner G. Krebs for membership into
the Kepler dev group.  Werner is working for the EOL (Encylopedia
of Science: http://eol.sdsc.edu) project at SDSC as a technical
lead. He has a PhD in bioinformatics and has been working in
various software projects related to this field. His CV and
publications are online at http://users.sdsc.edu/~wkrebs/pubs.html. He
will be developing Kepler workflows related to the
requirements of EOL project.

During his short time in the Kepler project, he has already
developed a WMSD actor (Info at:
http://www.ecoinformatics.org/pipermail/kepler-dev/2004-September/000938.htm
l) and a workflow related to submitting EOL tasks and monitoring their
status from Kepler, keeping in mind that these are long-running
tasks. IBM is funding the effort to integrate the EOL tasks into
the Kepler environment.

Please respond to the list (kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org) within 5
business days (until 11:59pm on wednesday, september 8th) with any
commentary
and a vote as follows:

     * Approve (+1) - Werner should BECOME A KEPLER VOTING MEMBER
     * Neutral (0)  -- NO OPINION
     * Disapprove (-1) - Werner should NOT BECOME A KEPLER VOTING MEMBER*.

*Note that a vote of Disapprove is a veto which guarantees failure of the
vote, so if you vote Disapprove, you must provide a reason for doing so.
If we don't get at least 2/3 of the members casting a vote, we should
probably ask for another vote or say that this vote has failed.

If you have any questions about this process, please refer to:
(http://kepler-project.org/management.html).
Note that only current contributing members of the project can vote.
(http://kepler-project.org/members.html).

Best,
Ilkay

_______________________________________________
kepler-dev mailing list
kepler-dev at ecoinformatics.org
http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/kepler-dev