[eml-dev] [Bug 1132] - fix access control rule ambiguities

[bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org]

http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132





------- Comment #14 from mob at icess.ucsb.edu  2008-11-13 17:09 -------
The physicalDistributionType should have looked like this (below), so that if
the references element is used, it is the only child of <distribution>. I
wrongly used the sequence model, which meant that <references> could have had
an <access> sibling.  This has been checked into cvs as rev 1.75


<xs:complexType name="PhysicalDistributionType">
    <xs:annotation>
      <xs:appinfo>
        <doc:tooltip>this type specifically for physical
connections.</doc:tooltip>
      </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    <xs:choice>
      <xs:sequence>
        <xs:choice>
          <xs:element name="online" type="PhysicalOnlineType"/>
          <xs:element name="offline" type="res:OfflineType"/>
          <xs:element name="inline" type="res:InlineType"/>
        </xs:choice>
        <xs:element name="access" type="acc:AccessType" minOccurs="0"/>
      </xs:sequence>
      <xs:group ref="res:ReferencesGroup"/>
    </xs:choice>
    <xs:attribute name="id" type="res:IDType" use="optional"/>
    <xs:attribute name="system" type="res:SystemType" use="optional"/>
    <xs:attribute name="scope" type="res:ScopeType" use="optional"
default="document"/>
  </xs:complexType>