[eml-dev] [Bug 2480] - Multiple date ranges in temporalCoverage

[inigo san gil]

Hi!

Some correspondences are found between FGDC's maintenance, update 
frequency and EML's <maintenance> element. See the  XSL code excerpt 
here. NOTE the comments, still work in progress.

Inigo
=========================================================================

            <maintenance><!--this is mandatory in BDP -->
                    <description>
                        <section>
                        <title><xsl:value-of select="'Progress'"/></title>
                        <para>
                            <xsl:for-each select="idinfo/status/progress">
                                <literalLayout>
                                    <xsl:value-of select="."/>
                                </literalLayout>
                            </xsl:for-each>
                        </para>
                        </section>
                        <section>
                            <title><xsl:value-of select="'Update'"/>  
</title>
                            <para>
                                <xsl:for-each select="idinfo/status/update">
                                    <literalLayout>
                                        <xsl:value-of select="."/>
                                    </literalLayout>
                                </xsl:for-each>
                            </para>
                        </section>
                    </description>
                    <xsl:for-each select="idinfo">
                        <xsl:for-each select="status">
                            <xsl:for-each select="update"><!-- weak 
proposal here, should review strategy (parse w/ Perl): EML has 
enumerated fields -->
                                
<maintenanceUpdateFrequency><xsl:value-of 
select="'otherMaintenancePeriod'"/></maintenanceUpdateFrequency>
                            </xsl:for-each>
                        </xsl:for-each>
                    </xsl:for-each>
                </maintenance>


bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org wrote:

>http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2480
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Comment #2 from john.cree at ec.gc.ca  2006-06-28 10:27 -------
>Thanks Matt.  I overlooked that the entire coverage was repeatable.
>
>Is there an equivalence for the Status fields from the CSDGM/NBII: Progress and
>Maintenance and Update Frequency?
>_______________________________________________
>Eml-dev mailing list
>Eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev
>  
>