[eml-dev] sponsored cvs access [VOTE]

[Saurabh Garg]

Yes approve.

Sid


Mark Servilla wrote:
> Yes, approve.
>
> Mark
>
> Matt Jones wrote:
>   
>> So, its been kindly pointed out that I missed two of our newer members 
>> -- apologies to Mark Servilla and Sid Garg -- we'll have to get the 
>> website updated. Sorry about that.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Matt
>>
>> Matt Jones wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On many occasions we've had need to give CVS access to the EML module to 
>>> people who are not members of the EML Project.  On other projects we 
>>> have changed our policies to allow "sponsored accounts" that give access 
>>> to non-members by making a sponsoring member responsible for all commits 
>>> and changes made.  I think this would be a good change to the EML 
>>> policies as well.  It would allow people who are temporarily working 
>>> with members to more easily make contributions, and it would help people 
>>> who want to become members to more easily make contributions. Sponsored 
>>> accounts would not have voting privileges, just CVS write access.
>>>
>>> [VOTE]
>>> The EML Project should change its charter to allow for the creation of 
>>> sponsored accounts granting CVS write access to non-members at the 
>>> request of and under the responsibility and review of a sponsoring 
>>> member of the EML project.
>>>     [Approve]   or [Neutral] or [Reject with explanation]
>>>
>>> Please vote by Aug 25.  Current members are: bergsma, berkley, blankman, 
>>> brunt, chapal, gries, higgins, jones, cjones, mccartney, obrien, ramsey, 
>>> and schildhauer (plus brooke who is inactive). Thanks.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Please vote by Aug 25.  Current members are: bergsma, berkley, blankman, 
>> brunt, chapal, garg, gries, higgins, jones, cjones, mccartney, obrien, 
>> ramsey, servilla, and schildhauer (plus brooke who is inactive). Thanks.
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Matt
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>