request eml dev status for saurab sood and gaurav gupta

[Chad Berkley]

I agree with Dan.  I think it would be useful for members to have 
trustees that have CVS write access.  There are several people like Jing 
here at NCEAS and Jim at PISCO that have made valuable contributions to 
EML via someone else (i.e. Chris and me).  It would be nice to allow 
them to write to CVS without strictly being a member of the EML group. 
I think that the policy should be that if you have a trustee that you 
want to give write access to, you are fully responsible for anything 
that he/she breaks when they commit stuff and it's the member's job to 
fix anything that gets broken.

chad

Dan Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
>    I have been somewhat bothered by this whole idea of getting approval 
> before someone not currently 'part of the club' can submit anything 
> related to EML to CVS. While letting anyone change the 'official EML 
> standard' documents in CVS makes no sense (a community vote here is 
> reasonable), it seems to me thtat there should be an area in the EML CVS 
> module where any EML related information, tools, etc, could easily be 
> submitted. Such submissions should be encouraged, not made more 
> difficult by requiring an election (or requiring the time of someone who 
> does have access)!
> 
> Dan Higgins
> 
> -----
> 
> David Blankman wrote:
> 
>> Chris,
>>
>> First, I think that your reason for disapproving Saurabh and Gaurav 
>> makes sense. I have no problem with doing the commits to cvs myself.
>>
>> Second, Matt had requested that I put the code for the conversion 
>> tools in the eml branch of cvs.
>>
>> Third, thanks for joining us at the LTER EML Implementation workshop.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> Christopher Jones wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> I would have to disapprove on this one.  I feel like there is a
>>> difference between having CVS write access, and being committed to the
>>> development of the EML spec and all that it entails.  There are a number
>>> of people at NCEAS, ASU CES, PISCO, etc. that contribute, but that 
>>> commit
>>> through Chad, myself, and others.  I realize this is less convenient, 
>>> but the
>>> general protocol of voting for inclusion does not just mean that they
>>> would have CVS commit access, but that they would also be voting
>>> here-on-out on EML issues that affect the entire community. For these
>>> reasons, the process of *demonstrating* commitment (list participation,
>>> code contributions, discussion, etc ...) has been put into place in 
>>> order
>>> to provide a means of evaluation, and then a vote.
>>>
>>> Also, EML is a content standard for the entire ecological community, not
>>> just the LTER community.  I don't understand why code would be 
>>> commited to
>>> the EML repository that is specific to the data models of individual 
>>> LTER
>>> sites.  Perhaps this code belongs in another module related to KNB
>>> products. I'm not sure about that.
>>>
>>> Anyway, with all respect to Saurabh and Gaurav, I certainly don't want
>>> anytone to think that my opinion is a reflection on them whatsoever.  It
>>> is merely a commentary on the process of EML voting and the like.
>>>
>>> All, please let me know if I'm interpreting the process incorrectly, 
>>> and I
>>> would be glad to reconsider.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> chris
>>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, David Blankman wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Gaurav Gupta and Saurab Sood are student programmers working for me at
>>>> the LTER Network Office. They are concentrating on writing applications
>>>> to convert legacy metadata to eml, including both dataset and remote
>>>> sensing metadata. They are making a major contribution to getting eml
>>>> from LTER sites.
>>>>
>>>> I would like them to be able to do cvs commits. My understanding is 
>>>> that
>>>> this requires approval by the eml-dev group.
>>>> Remember, the possible votes you can cast are:
>>>> approve     -- support the membership fully
>>>> whatever    -- don't know, or don't care enough to approve or object
>>>> disapprove  -- object -- this veto's the vote
>>>>
>>>> To pass, at least 2/3 of the members must vote (8) and 2/3 of those 
>>>> must
>>>> be approve votes with no disapprove votes cast.
>>>>
>>>> Gaurav Gupta
>>>> Approve:  David Blankman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Saurabh Sood
>>>> Approve:  David Blankman
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> David E. Blankman
>>>> Database Integration Developer
>>>> Long Term Ecological Research Network Office
>>>> University of New Mexico
>>>> 801 University, SE #104
>>>> Albuquerque, NM 87106
>>>> (505) 272-7346 / (505) 272-7080 FAX
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> eml-dev mailing list
>>>> eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
>>>> http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> David E. Blankman
>> Database Integration Developer
>> Long Term Ecological Research Network Office
>> University of New Mexico
>> 801 University, SE #104
>> Albuquerque, NM 87106
>> (505) 272-7346 / (505) 272-7080 FAX
>>  
>>
> 
> 


-- 
-----------------------
Chad Berkley
National Center for
Ecological Analysis
and Synthesis (NCEAS)
berkley at nceas.ucsb.edu
-----------------------