where are we?

[David Blankman]

I am a conflict on Monday morning. Tuesday morning would be fine. I 
could manage Monday afternoon if necessary.

The issues that I know are still outstanding are (there may be others):

1.   eml-physical/dataFormat.  The documentation review of eml-physical 
has been completed except for the issues in question (Bug 602)
2.  The eml-storedProcedure/parameter complex type needs to be fixed 
(bug 600)
3. eml-entity/other-entity (question about making atttibute required) 
(bug  596)
4. eml-project: descriptorType (is not used in current model) (bug 595)
5. GIS modules (Peter McCartney is in process of revising)
Chad Berkley wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I was wondering if everyone would like to get together either on a phone
>call or an IRC chat on Monday at 9:00 PDT to see where we are with EML
>and more specifically, what more needs to be done.  I think we are
>getting very close.  I've been looking over the documentation and most
>of it looks great.  Thanks everyone for getting good documentation
>written.  
>
>Unless someone volunteers to pay for a phone call, I would propose that
>we have an IRC discussion on Monday.  I think it should be short....an
>hour or less.  Basically everyone should go around the table and say
>what they've done, what they still need to do and raise any problems
>that they've seen with rc1.
>
>If anyone has a problem with this day or time, please respond to the
>list with an alternate.  I'm probably going to be gone next Thursday and
>Friday and I would really like to get rc2 release before I go, which I
>think is a reasonable goal given our current status.
>
>Talk to you later,
>chad
>
>  
>

-- 
David E. Blankman
Database Integration Developer
Long Term Ecological Research Network Office
University of New Mexico
801 University, SE #104
Albuquerque, NM 87106
(505) 272-7346 / (505) 272-7080 FAX