action items

[Scott Chapal]

Wow, it looks like you guys were really busy yesterday.

I just updated everything to take a look and rebuilt the docs,
dookbook and faqhtml.

So, regarding:

> * review all documentation on Monday - David, Scott

Can I start reviewing documentation over the weekend?  Or are there
other updates forthcoming?

Should I keep track of errors/ommissions etc. in the .xsd source files
themselves and then submit those?

For example, I just started looking at eml-access and encountered what
appears to be a mis-match between the element 'access' and the
documentation, which refers to 'the acl element'.  If 'acl element' IS
correct here, it's not particularly clear.  I'm guessing that the name
of the element changed, but the documentation didn't?

I could write a summary of these findings or I could just try to
correct them in the schema files and submit those for review?

How should David and I coordinate corrections?

Advise.


Also, is there a way to create emphasis in text that will be converted
to documentation?  Ie.

The <emphasis>allow</emphasis> element...

I know that won't work currently (ala docBook), but is there, or
should there be some way? - it might help clarify the readibility of
the docs.

-Scott

chad berkley <berkley at nceas.ucsb.edu> writes:

> hi all,
> 
> attached are the action items and the sample connection instance tree
> that we talked about on the call this morning.
> 
> chad
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Scott E. Chapal_________________________________________________
Database & Network Manager             scott.chapal at jonesctr.org
J.W. Jones Ecological Research Center          229.734.4706 x227
Rt. 2. Box. 2324. Newton, GA 31770-9651        229.734.6650 :FAX