stmml units: dimensionless and undefined
Scott Chapal
scott.chapal at jonesctr.org
Thu Oct 24 06:38:50 PDT 2002
Tim Bergsma <tbergsma at kbs.msu.edu> writes:
> After posting the question, I found an excellent use for both! Some
> attributes really are dimensionless, such as nominal attributes.
> Preserving 'undefined' (as a placeholder) allows system developers to
> make 'Units' required, even if all attributes have not yet been
> categorized. I would argue, however, that dimensionless and undefined
> should have different descriptions.
Dimensionless \Di*men"sion*less\, a.
Without dimensions; having no appreciable or noteworthy
extent. --Milton.
undefined
adj : not precisely limited, determined, or distinguished; "an
undefined term"; "undefined authority"; "some undefined
sense of excitement"; "vague feelings of sadness"; "a
vague uneasiness" [syn: vague] [ant: defined]
__________________________________________________________________
It seems that dimensionless is a more determinate term in the intended
usage in EML -- to convey the absence of an associated unit.
<unit id="undefined" name="undefined" unitType="undefined">
<description>Unit for fields with undefined (unknown) unit</description>
</unit>
<unit id="dimensionless" name="dimensionless" unitType="undefined">
<description>Unit for fields with no unit -- "dimensionless"</description>
</unit>
Is that intention better stated using the term "unitless" or "noUnit"?
<unit id="undefined" name="undefined" unitType="undefined">
<description>Unit designation for fields with undefined
(or unknown) unit</description>
</unit>
<unit id="noUnit" name="noUnit" unitType="undefined">
<description>Unit designation for fields that have no unit</description>
</unit>
-Scott
--
Scott E. Chapal_________________________________________________
Database & Network Manager scott.chapal at jonesctr.org
J.W. Jones Ecological Research Center 229.734.4706 x227
Rt. 2. Box. 2324. Newton, GA 31770-9651 229.734.6650 :FAX
More information about the Eml-dev
mailing list