[Bug 624] - eml-methods/methodsType needs clarification on choice/sequence

bugzilla-daemon@ecoinformatics.org bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org
Fri Oct 11 11:00:34 PDT 2002


http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624

dblankman at lternet.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|peter.mccartney at asu.edu     |dblankman at lternet.edu



------- Additional Comments From dblankman at lternet.edu  2002-10-11 11:00 -------
1. ProcedureStepType needs to be fixed. See attached ProcedureStepTypeFix.png
for proposed changes.

2. MethodsType should be changed. While technicly correct the current model is:

methodStep+ | sampling? | qualityControl*.   This should probably be changed to
either:

   A. methodStep+ | sampling | qualityControl+ (see MethodsType_option1.png)
       or
   B. methodStep | sampling | qualityControl

I recommend B since the choice is repetable and since both methodStep and
qualityControl are of type ProcedureStepType which allows for subSteps.

I also recommend that methodStep be renamed to method and subStep be renamed to
step (see MethodsType_option3.png). Both methodStep and qualityControl are of
type ProcedureStepType. For consistency we should have either:

   A. methodStep and qualityControlStep
       or
   B. method and qualityControl.

I recommend option B. 

David Blankman



More information about the Eml-dev mailing list