[Bug 624] - eml-methods/methodsType needs clarification on choice/sequence
bugzilla-daemon@ecoinformatics.org
bugzilla-daemon at ecoinformatics.org
Fri Oct 11 11:00:34 PDT 2002
http://bugzilla.ecoinformatics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624
dblankman at lternet.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|peter.mccartney at asu.edu |dblankman at lternet.edu
------- Additional Comments From dblankman at lternet.edu 2002-10-11 11:00 -------
1. ProcedureStepType needs to be fixed. See attached ProcedureStepTypeFix.png
for proposed changes.
2. MethodsType should be changed. While technicly correct the current model is:
methodStep+ | sampling? | qualityControl*. This should probably be changed to
either:
A. methodStep+ | sampling | qualityControl+ (see MethodsType_option1.png)
or
B. methodStep | sampling | qualityControl
I recommend B since the choice is repetable and since both methodStep and
qualityControl are of type ProcedureStepType which allows for subSteps.
I also recommend that methodStep be renamed to method and subStep be renamed to
step (see MethodsType_option3.png). Both methodStep and qualityControl are of
type ProcedureStepType. For consistency we should have either:
A. methodStep and qualityControlStep
or
B. method and qualityControl.
I recommend option B.
David Blankman
More information about the Eml-dev
mailing list