[VOTE] should we release eml-2.0.0 now?

[Peter McCartney]

approve. the problems we have been running into  lately are clearly beyond
bugs and point to some serious revisions we will want to consider for a new
release. but we cant really address those untill we get a user base
established. so lets stabilize for a year.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Jones [mailto:jones at nceas.ucsb.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:46 PM
To: eml-dev
Subject: [VOTE] should we release eml-2.0.0 now?


CALL FOR VOTES:
---------------
I, as an EML Project member, agree that we should release the current 
set of files from CVS that are tagged RELEASE_EML_2_0_0 as the final EML 
2.0.0 version.  This includes agreement that we will make every possible 
effort to maintain backwards compatibility with this release from this 
point forward (i.e., any document that is valid for EML 2.0.0 would also 
be valid for any new versions of EML that might be created in the future).

Vote one of:
------------
    Approve: I understand and agree with the release proposal
    Neutral: I am neutral
Disapprove: I block this from occurring (explanation required)

Deadline:
---------
Wed., December 11, 2003

Project member      Vote
---------------     ---------
Tim Bergsma
Chad Berkley
David Blankman
Matthew Brooke
James Brunt
Scott Chapal
Corinna Gries
Daniel Higgins
Matthew Jones       approve
Chris Jones
Peter McCartney
Ken Ramsey
Mark Schildhauer


I will collate the results after Wednesday.  We need a quorum (9 voters) 
and of those who cast a vote, at least 2/3 approval and no disapprove 
votes.  Looking forward to hearing your opinions...

Matt

_______________________________________________
eml-dev mailing list
eml-dev at ecoinformatics.org
http://www.ecoinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/eml-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mercury.nceas.ucsb.edu/ecoinformatics/pipermail/eml-dev/attachments/20021209/b1d8d144/attachment.htm